Does the philosophical content reflect the competence of the

Has anyone noticed websites where there is practically no information about products, but a lot of text about the company's philosophy and approaches to work? To what extent does such content reflect the real competence of the platform and can it be useful for understanding the architecture and integration of modules?

There are often resources where there is almost no information about products, but there is a lot of text about the company's philosophy and approaches to work, which at first glance looks useful, but in practice may reveal little about the platform's competencies. Personally, I pay attention to whether there is a description of modules, integration, and workflow. On the amazon.com website, for example, the text part is organically combined with specific technical explanations, which allows you to understand the architecture of the platform and evaluate its capabilities without unnecessary water.